QTc Calculator
QTc Calculator for Cardiology. Marked QTc prolongation warrants assessment of medications, electrolytes, measurement quality and clinical context. A threshold is a warning marker, not a probability of torsades or a diagnosis of congenital long-QT syndrome.
For shared guidance on choosing a tool and documenting results, read the clinical calculator workflow.
How this calculator works
The tool accepts QT in milliseconds and heart rate, derives RR as 60/heart rate in seconds, and offers Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham and Hodges corrections.
When to use this calculator
To support interpretation of a carefully measured QT interval. Record the correction formula when comparing serial ECGs.
Inputs used
- Measured QT interval in milliseconds
- Heart rate in beats/min
- Correction formula
- Sex category used for displayed thresholds
Clinical interpretation
Marked QTc prolongation warrants assessment of medications, electrolytes, measurement quality and clinical context. A threshold is a warning marker, not a probability of torsades or a diagnosis of congenital long-QT syndrome.
Worked example
QT 440 ms at 100 beats/min gives RR 0.6 seconds: Bazett 568.0 ms, Fridericia 521.7 ms, Framingham 501.6 ms and Hodges 510.0 ms. All four exceed 500 ms; the lower alternatives do not remove concern.
Limitations and safety notes
Heart-rate extremes, irregular rhythms and a wide QRS complicate interpretation. The derived RR is an average estimate and does not replace beat selection and manual ECG review.
Frequently asked questions
Can I compare different formulas as though they are interchangeable?
No. They have different rate behavior; consistent serial methods improve interpretability.
Does the tool accept RR directly?
No. This implementation derives RR from heart rate.
References
- Drew BJ et al. Prevention of Torsade de Pointes in Hospital Settings. AHA/ACCF Scientific Statement. 2010. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.001
- A comparison of commonly used QT correction formulae: The effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2004. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022073604001001
Editorial review and citation methodology
Maintained by the Quick Medical Calculator Editorial Team. Content record date: September 7, 2026. A content date is not evidence of independent clinical review. Individual clinical sign-off is not recorded on this page.
- Prefer original validation studies for scoring systems and prediction tools.
- Use current specialty society guidance, transplant allocation policy, public health guidance, or regulator resources when they govern clinical use.
- Include limitations and safety notes when a calculator is population-specific, context-dependent, or unsuitable as a standalone decision tool.
Related reviewed calculators
- CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score Calculator - Cardiology
- HAS-BLED Score Calculator - Cardiology
- HEART Score Calculator - Cardiology
- Mean Arterial Pressure Calculator - Cardiology